- Main
- Society, Politics & Philosophy
- Does State Spying Make Us Safer?: The...
Does State Spying Make Us Safer?: The Munk Debate On Mass Surveillance
Michael Hayden, Alan Dershowitz, Glenn Greenwald, Alexis Ohanianこの本はいかがでしたか?
ファイルの質はいかがですか?
質を評価するには、本をダウンロードしてください。
ダウンロードしたファイルの質はいかがでしたか?
Does government surveillance make us safer?
The thirteenth Munk Debate, held in Toronto on Friday, May 2, 2014, pitted Michael Hayden and Alan Dershowitz against Glenn Greenwald and Alexis Ohanian to debate whether state surveillance is a legitimate defense of our freedom. In a risk-filled world, democracies are increasingly turning to large-scale state surveillance, at home and abroad, to fight complex and unconventional threats — but is it justified?
For some, the threats justify the current surveillance system, and the laws and institutions of democracies are capable of balancing the needs of individual privacy with collective security. But for others, we're in peril of sacrificing to a vast and unaccountable state surveillance apparatus the civil liberties that guarantee citizens’ basic freedoms and our democratic way of life.
In this edition of the Munk Debates, former head of the CIA and NSA Michael Hayden and civil liberties lawyer Alan Dershowitz square off against journalist Glenn Greenwald and reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian to debate the legitimacy of state surveillance. With issues of Internet privacy gaining prominence, the Munk Debate on the Surveillance State asks: Should government be able to monitor our activities to keep us safe?
The thirteenth Munk Debate, held in Toronto on Friday, May 2, 2014, pitted Michael Hayden and Alan Dershowitz against Glenn Greenwald and Alexis Ohanian to debate whether state surveillance is a legitimate defense of our freedom. In a risk-filled world, democracies are increasingly turning to large-scale state surveillance, at home and abroad, to fight complex and unconventional threats — but is it justified?
For some, the threats justify the current surveillance system, and the laws and institutions of democracies are capable of balancing the needs of individual privacy with collective security. But for others, we're in peril of sacrificing to a vast and unaccountable state surveillance apparatus the civil liberties that guarantee citizens’ basic freedoms and our democratic way of life.
In this edition of the Munk Debates, former head of the CIA and NSA Michael Hayden and civil liberties lawyer Alan Dershowitz square off against journalist Glenn Greenwald and reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian to debate the legitimacy of state surveillance. With issues of Internet privacy gaining prominence, the Munk Debate on the Surveillance State asks: Should government be able to monitor our activities to keep us safe?
年:
2014
出版社:
House of Anansi Press Inc.
言語:
english
ページ:
128
ISBN 10:
1770898425
ISBN 13:
9781770898424
ファイル:
EPUB, 1.74 MB
あなたのタグ:
IPFS:
CID , CID Blake2b
english, 2014
1~5分以内にこのファイルをあなたの電子メールにお届けします。
ファイルはTelegramメッセンジャー経由で送信されます。受け取るまでに1〜5分かかる場合があります。
注意:Z-LibraryのTelegramボットにアカウントをリンクさせていることを確認してください。
ファイルはKindleアカウントに送信されます。受け取るまでに1〜5分かかる場合があります。
注意!Kindleへ送信するすべての本は、メールによる確認が求められています。Amazon Kindle Supportからメールが送信されますので、メールをご確認ください。
への変換進行中。
への変換が失敗しました。